Antonio Sanfilippo (Partanna, 1923 – Rome, 1980) was one of the leading figures in postwar Italian abstraction. His painting created a universe of minute marks, mobile structures, and chromatic rhythms, in which the surface represents no objects but records tensions and relationships. Looking at his artworks, one often has the feeling of standing before an unknown script: a language that does not ask to be translated into words, because its meaning arises from the movement of forms themselves.
Rome and the Forma 1 era
After his artistic training in Sicily, Sanfilippo settled in Rome and took part in the climate of renewal that followed the Second World War. In 1947, he was among the signatories of the Forma 1 manifesto, alongside artists such as Carla Accardi, Pietro Consagra, Piero Dorazio, Achille Perilli, and Giulio Turcato. The group asserted the possibility of reconciling a progressive political orientation with the freedom of abstract research, at a time when Italian debate often set realism against non-figuration.
For Sanfilippo, this choice was not merely theoretical. Abandoning representation meant questioning painting through its essential elements: color, mark, the distribution of forms, and the relationship between empty and full space. His early works show a construction still close to postwar geometries; gradually, however, his language becomes freer and more personal. The compositions lose their rigidity, while small elements cluster and disperse across the surface.
The mark as a living organism
The most recognizable feature of his mature work is a network of short marks, curves, fragments, and color clusters that seem to move through space. They are not letters in the traditional sense, even when they resemble them. They are visual units that gain meaning through their reciprocal distances, repetition, and variation. A dense area can coexist with an almost empty field; a rhythmic sequence can break off abruptly, leaving the eye to reconstruct a balance.
His proximity to certain European Art Informel experiences does not diminish the distinctiveness of his work. Sanfilippo does not entrust everything to impulsive gestures: he often organizes the surface with an extremely controlled compositional sensibility. Color, sometimes intense and contrasting, sometimes more restrained, does not simply fill in outlines but determines the image's breathing. L'work arises from the encounter between apparent spontaneity and structure.
Works on Paper and Graphic Research
Drawing and printmaking are privileged ways of approaching his language. On paper, the mark can appear with particular immediacy, showing how a slight change in direction or thickness alters the rhythm of the whole. For printed artworks, it is essential to identify the technique actually used: lithography, screenprint, and engraving involve different processes and should not be attributed automatically based on the image's appearance.
For accurate cataloging, the presence of a signature, any numbering, the dimensions of the sheet and image, the publisher, and documentation all matter. The historical significance of his research, however, goes beyond any single technique. Sanfilippo helped demonstrate that abstract painting can possess great expressive power without relying on narrative: the surface becomes a sensitive space, traversed by marks that seem to have a life of their own.